(03-19-2024, 01:57 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 01:54 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ]Your "point" is irrelevant in the first place. LOL
No, you insisted that Madushanka did not bowl well against Pakistan though you did not watch a single delivery
I still insist he didn't bowl well, he was wicketless and expensive which is a fact. No excuses can hide that fact. Whether I watched or not is irrelevant. That's it from me on this subject.
(03-19-2024, 02:03 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 01:57 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ]No, you insisted that Madushanka did not bowl well against Pakistan though you did not watch a single delivery
I still insist he didn't bowl well, he was wicketless and expensive which is a fact. No excuses can hide that fact. Whether I watched or not is irrelevant. That's it from me on this subject.
That shows how much you actually know about cricket. I would never comment on a player if I had not watched that match closely.
Without knowing a match situation, how could you simply look at scorecards and comment like the way you do? Then, coaches, selectors and other coaching staff members just could stay home without watching matches and make decisions on players by reading the scorecards and Googling them
You are becoming a cricket joker!
(03-19-2024, 02:03 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 01:57 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ]No, you insisted that Madushanka did not bowl well against Pakistan though you did not watch a single delivery
I still insist he didn't bowl well, he was wicketless and expensive which is a fact. No excuses can hide that fact. Whether I watched or not is irrelevant. That's it from me on this subject.
You quite literally did by replying to me when i said he bowled well.
(03-19-2024, 02:41 AM)BELSWILF Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 02:03 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ]I still insist he didn't bowl well, he was wicketless and expensive which is a fact. No excuses can hide that fact. Whether I watched or not is irrelevant. That's it from me on this subject.
That shows how much you actually know about cricket. I would never comment on a player if I had not watched that match closely.
Without knowing a match situation, how could you simply look at scorecards and comment like the way you do? Then, coaches, selectors and other coaching staff members just could stay home without watching matches and make decisions on players by reading the scorecards and Googling them
You are becoming a cricket joker!
LOL, you are a joker not knowing the difference between coaching staff/selectors and normal cricket fans like us in the forum. No point saying anything else to a person who doesn't seem to know that basic difference. Still being childish.
(03-19-2024, 04:26 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 02:03 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ]I still insist he didn't bowl well, he was wicketless and expensive which is a fact. No excuses can hide that fact. Whether I watched or not is irrelevant. That's it from me on this subject.
You quite literally did by replying to me when i said he bowled well.
If you really want to have the last word, start by saying something sensible.
I also watched the Pakistan match. What was so good about what Madushanka did?
(03-19-2024, 07:55 AM)pj57 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 04:26 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ]You quite literally did by replying to me when i said he bowled well.
If you really want to have the last word, start by saying something sensible.
What did I say that was not sensible
(03-19-2024, 07:56 AM)Regista Wrote: [ -> ]I also watched the Pakistan match. What was so good about what Madushanka did?
I dont think he bowled badly
(03-19-2024, 08:02 AM)slcricfan1 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2024, 07:56 AM)Regista Wrote: [ -> ]I also watched the Pakistan match. What was so good about what Madushanka did?
I dont think he bowled badly
So you have moved the goal posts from bowled very well to don't think he bowled badly. Bit more sensible.