Sri Lanka Cricket Discussion Thread

[pj57]

[Bada]

He couldn't send that quick return from the deep after this and didn't field much near the boundary

Quote:Murali's shoulder may need surgery

11-Aug-2004

CJ Clarke, Sri Lanka's physio, gave a little more insight into the problem. "Murali has been having shoulder pains for months now," he said. "He looks to be suffering from two problems, basic wear and tear of the shoulder joint and a build-up of fluid around a nerve, from overuse, which is not usually a serious condition. However, until we know what the surgeon has done we cannot speculate on how long he will be out of action.

"If the fluid is drained and that relieves the pain then he could be back for the Champions Trophy, which is our aim at the moment. But if David Young decides to clean up the joint, or discovers something else that is wrong, then he could be out for longer."

Murali had been nursing a sore shoulder for many months, but prior to the first Test at Galle he complained that the pain was worsening. He played in the Test, and took five wickets, but aggravated the injury.

https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/murali-s-shoulder-may-need-surgery-135096

Quote:"We've advised him to have the surgery. Otherwise, if it gets worse, it could threaten his career," said Young. The surgery will treat a superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion, which in layman's terms is a type of cyst which has caused a build-up of fluid around the nerves in his right shoulder. The problem developed because of the huge amount Muralitharan has bowled during his career. He has bowled more than 5000 overs in Tests alone.

https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/murali-to-have-surgery-135182

[Regista]

(02-24-2024, 05:10 AM)Bada Wrote:  Dharme is doing well again
https://twitter.com/Cricket_decoded/status/1760907895116583213

Those Joel Wilson stats....
Seriously, why is he still umpiring? My grandma could literally do better or equal.

[Bada]

Thurunu Jayasiri@ThurunuJ
4th 'Player of the series' award for Wanindu Hasaranga.

No one has more 'Player of the series' award in T20I internationals since Hasaranga's debut.

[Bada]

That's how we do it in SL
https://twitter.com/MarkMachado/status/1761363226913030413

[BELSWILF]

(02-24-2024, 05:10 AM)Bada Wrote:  Dharme is doing well again
https://twitter.com/Cricket_decoded/status/1760907895116583213

I was watching the 3rd session yesterday and England reviewed an LBW appeal that Dharme gave as Not Out for Safaraz. Until the hawk-eye path was shown, anyone would guess it as an out, going by the impact point. But turned out, the balls path went over the wicket.
I am not sure how Dharme got that correct.

Now if he goes like this, teams would not take reviews againstDharme’s decisions to save a review for them. He is leaps ahead than other Sri Lankan umpires like Lyndon Hanibal, Rambukwella etc. But umpire Ruchira Palliyaguru is the next best from us.

[pj57]

There have been a lot of reviews already in this match, 14 in all. Nine in England's innings and 5 in India's. Dharmasena has got 7 out of 8 correct so far while Tucker has got 4 out of 6 correct.

[pj57]

Hasaranga suspended for 2 matches, will miss the first two t20Is against BD. ICC's double standards, nothing for the umpire who made a glaring mistake.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/sri-lanka-skipper-receives-suspension-for-breach-of-code-of-conduct

Sri Lanka’s T20I skipper and second-ranked T20I bowler on the ICC Men's Player Rankings, Wanindu Hasaranga, has been presented with a two-match suspension after his total demerit points reached five within a 24-month period following his latest breach of the ICC Code of Conduct, for which he received a 50 per cent fine and three demerit points.

Hasaranga was found guilty of breaching article 2.13 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to “Personal abuse of a Player, Player Support Personnel, Umpire or Match Referee during an International Match.

Hasaranga's accumulation of five demerit points results in a conversion to two suspension points. This means he will either get a ban for one Test match or two ODIs or T20Is, whichever comes first, for the player or player support personnel. Consequently, Hasaranga will be suspended from participating in Sri Lanka's first two T20Is against Bangladesh next month.

The incident unfolded at the end of the third T20I between Sri Lanka and Afghanistan in Dambulla, as Hasaranga approached umpire Lyndon Hanibal to express criticism regarding a decision of a high full toss not called a no-ball.

Afghanistan player Rahmanullah Gurbaz has also been penalised. He has been fined 15 per cent of his match fee for breaching Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct in the same match.

Rahmanullah was found in violation of article 2.4 of the Code, which pertains to “Disobeying an Umpire’s instruction during an International Match.”

Furthermore, one demerit point has been added to Rahmanullah's disciplinary record, marking his second offence within a 24-month period and bringing his total demerit points to two.

The sanction was imposed on Rahmanullah for altering the grip of his bat on the field despite repeated warnings against doing so.

Both players admitted to the offences and accepted the sanctions proposed by Chris Broad of the Emirates ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees. Consequently, formal hearings were deemed unnecessary.

The charges were brought forth by on-field umpires Lyndon Hannibal and Raveendra Wimalasiri, third umpire Ruchira Palliyaguruge, and fourth umpire Ranmore Martinez.

Sri Lanka secured the three-match T20I series, 2-1 as Afghanistan clinched a win in the final T20I. Hasaranga was awarded the Player of the Series for his all-round performance.

[Bada]

https://twitter.com/akalugalage/status/1761251145669026252

[Bada]

Was Wanindu’s action an act of heroism or nastiness?

In the aftermath of a contentious umpiring decision by Lyndon Hannibal during the third and final T20 international between Sri Lanka and Afghanistan, the reaction of Sri Lanka skipper Wanindu Hasaranga has drawn significant attention.

Hasaranga’s on-field altercation with the umpire at the end of the match and his subsequent remarks at the press conference have raised concerns about his sportsmanship and respect for the game.

“This cannot happen in an international match. If it had been a little bit higher, it could have endangered the batsman. I believe the umpire is unfit for international cricket. He would be better suited to another role,” an angry Hasaranga said, at the post-series press conference in Dambulla.

“It was undoubtedly a no-ball. There’s no ambiguity about it. If a mistake was made, one must be humble enough to accept it. I question his suitability for the game.”

The incident in question unfolded during a critical juncture in the match where Sri Lanka required 11 runs off the last three deliveries to chase down a target of 210 for a clean series sweep. However, Afghanistan bowler Wafadar Momand delivered a ball that passed batsman Kamindu Mendis at almost shoulder height without touching the ground.

Despite appeals from the batter to declare it a no-ball–as the ICC’s playing conditions states that a ball passing a batsman above waist height without pitching should be considered as such–both the square leg umpire, Lyndon Hannibal, and head umpire, Ravindra Wimalasiri, deemed the high full toss a legal delivery. Had it been called a no-ball, the outcome of the match might have been different, as Sri Lanka lost by a mere three runs.

Hasaranga, expressing his frustration and discontent with the decision, garnered attention with his direct criticism of the umpire, displaying a lack of respect for sportsmanship. Hannibal later admitted to the mistake, explaining that he had lost sight of the ball in the crowd, and clarified that there were no provisions to consult with the third umpire unless it pertained to a dismissal.

“An umpire can only check the foot no-ball of a bowler. We have no authority under the laws to review other decisions. We must adhere to the rules, and we are bound by them. In franchise cricket, such decisions can be reviewed with the third umpire. This can confuse. In ICC cricket, however, we have not yet adopted such a practice,” he was quoted as saying.

This incident is not the first time such decisions have gone against teams, nor will it be the last. The 2007 World Cup final between Australia and Sri Lanka ended controversially with Australia winning in the dark, in a match affected by weather and the Duckworth/Lewis method. Match officials had misinterpreted the laws, and match referee Jeff Crowe later said was embarrassed about the conduct of the match. In 2019, umpire Kumar Dharmasena erroneously awarded England six runs instead of five during the World Cup final against New Zealand. Hasaranga can learn to lot from Mahela Jayawardena and Kane Williamson who were at the receiving end in the two World Cup finals.

While some may justify Hasaranga’s reaction by drawing parallels with Arjuna Ranatunga, who defended Muttiah Muralidaran against biased umpiring decisions by certain Australian officials, it’s essential to recognise that this was a human error.

Hasaranga’s response highlights a lack of humility and underscores the dangers of succumbing to emotions in the heat of the moment. His comments not only reflect poorly on his sportsmanship but also risk tarnishing the reputation of the game and its officials. By publicly criticising the umpire and questioning his suitability for international cricket, Hasaranga undermines the authority of the official and sets a negative example for aspiring cricketers and fans.

Also, Hasaranga’s refusal to recognise the possibility of human error in umpiring decisions reveals a lack of understanding of the challenges faced by umpires. In cricket, as in any sport, split-second judgments are made under immense pressure, and occasional mistakes are inevitable.

By failing to recognise this reality and resorting to harsh criticism, Hasaranga missed an opportunity to demonstrate resilience and grace in the face of adversity.

While emotions may run high in competitive environments, players need to uphold the values of respect, humility and fair play. As cricket continues to captivate audiences worldwide, maintaining the highest standards of sportsmanship and integrity is paramount. By embracing these values, players can leave a lasting legacy that transcends individual achievements on the field.

https://www.sundaytimes.lk/240225/sports/was-wanindus-action-an-act-of-heroism-or-nastiness-549998.html